Sign up for myFT Daily Digest and be the first to learn about management news.
When historians look back at the nature of their work in the second half of 2021, they will find some strange developments.
A US president has ordered large companies to insist that employees be vaccinated against the virus or undergo weekly testing.Wall Street Bank has prohibit People from the United States who have not been vaccinated.Amazon has supply If British workers manage to get to work on time, they will get a bonus of £50 a week.
I am as frustrated as mail. Smoking is a harmful habit, but it is also an addiction. For bosses, people cannot smoke in their homes, where they do many other unwise but legal things, which crosses a considerable threshold.
Other companies in Japan have taken bold measures to prevent employees from smoking, but I think it is not easy or legal for a British company to ban smoking in the country. The large-scale shift to working from home may have changed this.We cannot be sure whether such a ban is legal, because it has not been tested in court, saying Jo Mackie, Slater and Gordon, Head of Employment, London law office. “But I think it’s possible,” she told me last week.
Employers already have a legal obligation to protect the health and safety of workers before a pandemic. Despite Covid, this responsibility continues, which is why many British employers have been checking to ensure that employees at home have a decent chair and a laptop that is line-of-sight.
If widespread domestic work continues (which seems likely), Mackie believes that employers can successfully argue that because the law prohibits smoking in the basically enclosed space of the workplace, the room where a person works from home should also be smoke-free.
“It makes people unhappy,” she said, but it doesn’t stop them from going out and smoking. The biggest question is how far the law defines the home office as a workplace, as McGee said, “After the pandemic, this is more ambiguous than in the past.”
If you work in a place like the World Health Organization, these shouldn’t be a hassle.Back in 2005 it Announce It has a new recruitment policy: smokers do not need to apply.
this rule It still works, the UN agency told me last week. Anyone who applies for a job online will be asked if they smoke or use tobacco products, and if they are hired, will they continue to do so. If the answer to both questions is “yes”, the applicant is out. Anyone who lied about smoking and is hired will face disciplinary action if discovered.
People can understand why global health agencies try to eliminate tobacco as much as possible. Tobacco is the leading cause of preventable deaths, leading to more than 8 million people Every year on a global scale. But what about moving companies?
Last year in the United States, U-Haul moving and warehousing company became the first batch of the industry Announce It will no longer employ “nicotine users”. The company has more than 30,000 employees in the U.S. and Canada and stated that the new policy is part of an effort to promote a healthy culture, “to help our team members take a healthy journey.”
The health journey is only carried out in the 21 states that allow such recruitment bans, and U-Haul is providing smoking cessation assistance to existing employees.But considering that smoking is an overwhelming torture to the poor and Disadvantaged, Even some anti-smoking campaigners are uncomfortable with these measures.
“In the past, everyone smoked,” said Deborah Arnott, chief executive of the British Smoking and Health Charity Action. She added that this situation has changed because their smoking “seems incorrect or unfair”, thus preventing poor or less educated people from working. It is best for the boss to help employees resign, rather than bullying them or refusing to hire them. I agree. Smoking is a scourge, and the sooner it ends, the better. But when it comes to eliminating this situation at work, employers should really be very careful.