Coronavirus Update: For the third consecutive day, the number of Covid hospitalizations in the United States is less than 100,000


According to a new report by a group of leading scientists, the current evidence does not show that the general population needs a Covid-19 booster.

The researchers analyzed the research on the efficacy of the vaccine and said that the existing data did not provide credible evidence that the protection against serious diseases after vaccination was significantly reduced.

The report was published in the medical journal The Lancet on Monday and was written by Soumya Swaminathan, Ana-Maria Henao-Restrepo and Mike Ryan of the World Health Organization.

The scientists said: “Although the benefits of primary Covid-19 vaccination clearly outweigh the risks, there may be risks if boosters are widely introduced too early or too frequently.”

“Therefore, the current evidence does not seem to indicate the need for intensive treatment in the general population, where the efficacy of serious diseases is still high,” they continued.

A recent study conducted on Israel’s experience in the first three weeks of August “shows the efficacy of the third dose” compared to two doses.

But researchers say that very short-term protection does not necessarily mean worthwhile long-term benefits.

According to the report, in Israel, people who were vaccinated in January or April are less effective against severe diseases than people who were vaccinated in February or March, “this shows that these data are difficult to interpret.”

Scientists call for careful and open review of evolving research to ensure that decisions about promotion are based on sound science, not politics.

The scientists said: “Even if booster vaccination is ultimately proven to reduce the medium-term risk of serious diseases, if the current vaccine supply is used in people who have not been vaccinated before, more lives can be saved instead of being vaccinated. Used as a booster in the population of vaccines.”


Source link